Using Social Product Development To Bake In Communication

2009 October 9

bakedin_approach

At Mutopo, many of the organizations we work with are early stage. They raise money to bring new things to market. So they need ways to reduce the chance of a launch #fail. And they need to reduce the cost of launch, since burning through their hard won cash will also lead to #fail.

But why:

  1. do so many products fail when they launch?
  2. does it still cost so much to launch a new product?

The social web seems to be offering some hope on 2, potentially joining search marketing in a formidably efficient pairing. However, perhaps the products can help too, by speaking for themselves?

Baking Products With Lower Failure Rates & Lower Launch Costs

Yep, turns out products are social, too.  In their new book, Baked In, John Winsor and Alex Bogusky share their thinking and recipes on how to build communication into products, so they can help get themselves to market.

One of the reasons we were excited about this book – we’d heard the idea before, from another very smart person.  Roelof Botha at Sequoia Capital, used the same words to describe what he helped to do with Paypal and Youtube – they “baked in” the marketing. They found ways to have people help them spread the products via email, ebay and social networks.

What do Sequoia and CP&B folks have in common? They really, really know how to get new products to market. So among other things, they have found ways to reduce the launch costs and reduce the risks of failure. So we’re listening and watching and with Baked In’s encouragement, stealing with our eyes and ears, where we can.

We like much of what they do and say, but we are interested in particular idea that is common to both of their strategies – the role of co-creators.  I dont know if the Baked In page 39 diagram hack (featured above ) is better, but I’d like to suggest it for a future Baked In version because I think this is what they mean. And the Baked In folks are making it as easy as possible to make these kinds of suggests on their Wiki Blog thingy (that may be how you found this post).

Why are the co-creators so important? Well they can do so much to help. Early on in the product development process, they can give critical feedback and ideas to help make products that they are more likely to use – i.e. products less likely to #fail. They can help teams prioritize by elevating the importance of issues they may have downplayed. They can give feedback on prototypes.

In the chart below, the bottom line, shows a traditional process. People are invited in selectively for research and then perhaps a soft launch. But in social product development, prospective customers are invited into more aspects of the development. They get to see more and influence more. And ultimately they help reduce the risk of failure at launch.

traditional_pd_vs_social_pd

But they help with something else, too.  Not only do people co-create, they c0-own.  This may be best described by the ikea effect – the idea that people are willing to pay more for things they have had a hand in creating. i.e. they feel ownership. And this seems to mean they are more likely to help get the word out and buy. So they can also help reduce launch costs (economic costs, anyway).

So we really believe the co-creators are the key to reducing the chances of product #fail.

But how?

Learning by doing

Window_Boxen_Perspective_View

At Mutopo we realized the best way to understand baking in and social product development, was to try it. We cant share some of our client projects yet, but we can talk about some of our own:

betacup - We’re all working on betacup to create a more sustainable coffee drinking experience
window boxen – Marcel is working with the Quirky community to get his Window Boxen window farming (initial concept rendering shown  above) ideas to market.
skin colaboratorie – Andrea is doing the Skin Colaboratorie to create new skincare productsto target specific ailments

Just like my experience with the Jovoto community, even at the concept stages, the feedback can be enormously valuable in shaping the product (unfortunately I didnt have the skill to do more with my Jovoto submission).

We’ll let you know, as we learn more. In the meanwhile, we’d love to know what you think so drop us a line or find me @shaunabe.

5 Responses leave one →
  1. 2009 October 9

    Shaun, great post. The most interesting crossover int he discussion is the ability to co-create products that are destined to be shared. Ultimately, the line between product and communication is not only erased, but a new circle drawn around these two areas, making them one.

  2. 2009 October 9
    Shaun permalink

    Agreed. Now all we have to do, is figure out how to do this.

    The thing that amazes me, is people’s willingness and ability to contribute beyond just making conversation but making a real impact on how things are made. Will be interesting to go through projects and try to tease out the types of impact that feedback had on shaping the outcome.

    • 2009 November 16

      And now companies just need to trust the wisdom and willingness of the crowds to provide valuable input and not worry so much about opening up their concepts and ask for help early in the process.

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. How open is Open Innovation? « colaboratorie mutopo
  2. Using Social Product Developent for The Betacup « colaboratorie mutopo

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS